Metric vs. Imperial system smack-down

Here's a funny (and over-the-top) diatribe on the advantages of the Imperial over the metric measurement system:

The metric system also fails to be sized appropriately for humans. Because of its derivation, units of measure are divisible by ten, but ill-suited for labor that does not involve extensive mathematical computations. Is it any wonder that a man is still six feet tall? Measuring a six-foot, 31-year-old man's height in centimeters (182) makes as much sense as measuring his age in months (372).

Link

Posted by: Mike on Wed, 05/28/2008 at 7:41pm

Imperial versus Metric

That formulation is wrong, one versus the other. We do that with OSs too; the Mac versus Windows simply proves that we are idle too much of the time. Each system has advantages. When I am doing research, measuring chemicals, and such I use the metric system. When I am describing the redhead in the apartment down the hall I use the imperial. The metric system ain't sexy.

I use both.

saint satin stain (not verified) – Sat, 06/28/2008 – 11:18pm

Down with the Imperial system!

100 centremetes is a meter. Simple. A human brain can work that out and translate between them with ease.
36 inches is a yard. Ok, so what's 7 yards? Whip out those calculators people.

The metric system was developed once science was matured and people were able to create a proper, legitimate measurement system that makes sense.
The imperial system is a culmination of primitive ideas like the length of a standard foot. The system works but its gumby and disconnected from itself. It's just like anything else, before we developed proper materials to make clothes, we used pre-existing materials from animals and vegetation. You don't see anyone wearing pocketless 'imperial' bush clothes in the developed world do you? It's same with ideas of how we got here. Today, we have proper tools to try and figure it out the correct way, in the past we all made up our own gods and killed as many people as possible to make them popular. These days we recognise how stupid that is.

I do agree though, it's sexy to say "she's 6 foot". However, this is only because we have been doing it for so long. Try on "she's 182 high" it'll eventually replace obsolete references.

Down with all Imperial systems!!

Septus Rake (not verified) – Wed, 07/16/2008 – 5:23pm

Metric

"Ok, so what's 7 yards?"

Ehrr....seven yards maybe?

"before we developed proper materials to make clothes"

Like cashmere, wool, cotton, linen, silk and leather maybe? Synthetics are good for mountain climbing, and a few other highly specialised applications, otherwise unattractive, useless and ugly.....a bit like your metric system.

If your system is so great why don't we metricise the calendar and the clock?

Guest (not verified) – Sun, 07/27/2008 – 5:16pm

As a german scientist I

As a german scientist I might be full of prejudice, but COMMON!
Ever looked at the definition of the Fahrenheit Scale?
That's just rediculous!

Guest (not verified) – Fri, 08/22/2008 – 3:53am

That's all there is to say about it

http://hubpages.com/hub/metric_system_vs_imperial_system

Guest (not verified) – Fri, 08/22/2008 – 3:57am

Post new comment

This helps us decide if you are a human, and not just some visiting bot.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h3> <h4> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options